Chris Zuccarini, Managing Director, National Health Care Practice, Risk Strategies Company
The trend of private equity (PE) firms seeking high returns in health care has been in full bloom for more than a decade. But whereas previously PE was focused on a top-down approach of buying hospitals and health systems, that focus has begun to shift toward less-costly, smaller specialty groups and physician practices.
Bain & Company’s 2021 Global Healthcare Private Equity and M&A Report found that investors are pursuing new “buy-and-build” strategies in less-penetrated segments of the provider sector. The report notes that there is increased focus among PE firms on areas that are promoting the shift toward home-based and outpatient care, along with “risk-bearing targets” like Medicare Advantage providers operating under capitation models and behavioral health providers.
Mission Alignment is Essential
For health care entities considering an investment from a private equity firm, the risk/reward calculus is complicated by recent downturns in patient volume and revenues due to COVID-19. The pandemic exposed the weaknesses that small providers face in a fee-for-service (FFS) environment and amplified the need for health care companies to maintain sufficient capital resources on hand to remain competitive and viable
The short-term financial windfall that may come from an acquisition must be weighed against the long-term implications, especially for physician practices who need to consider whether they are going to be part of an eventual sale. PE firms have a term of exit, typically within five to seven years, to meet shareholder obligations, so it is fair to raise a concern about what happens when that time is up.
Perhaps most importantly, compatibility relies on cultural alignment between PE firms and health care organizations. The economic model must support the care mission. Ensuring that the missions of the acquiring and acquired organizations are transparent and well aligned is critical for successful outcomes.
Improvements in Efficiency and Accountability
Partnerships between PE firms and medical groups have proven especially advantageous for easing the administrative burden for smaller providers. PE provides practices with a backstop to improve cash cycles and back-office processes, such as management reporting and compliance work.
PE investment has also allowed post-acute companies to grow and test new business models, delivering greater access to in-home care and telehealth. Technology is breaking down the traditional brick–and- mortar localized care delivery system, expanding access and lowering costs. PE brings the capital, and the know-how, to build these assets at scale.
In addition, the involvement of a PE firm creates visibility into the performance of a health care business, holding internal teams accountable for efficiencies to satisfy shareholders while delivering exemplary patient care. In August 2020, a JAMA study found hospitals acquired by PE firms experienced increases in net income as well as improvement in quality metrics.
Thinking Long Term
The health care industry is in a mature stage of PE involvement in core hospital service. With increased segmentation across the industry, the trend is growing and shifting. A JAMA study released in February 2020 found that more than 350 physician practices were acquired by PE firms between 2013 and 2016. The study concludes that PE firms see ample business opportunities in the physician practice space, expecting annual returns greater than 20%, though there remain “unknown implications for care delivery and patient outcomes” in the future.
Provider leaders should consider what they need long-term out of a PE transaction, secure commitments to quality and ensure that the new management will continue to invest as the industry moves away from FFS and expands into new business models.
Practices also need to consider the legal and compliance complexities that can arise out of the new administrative structures resulting from a PE investment. Risk Strategies Health Care Practice experts have extensive experience evaluating and advising on these partnerships and stand ready to help you achieve the best possible outcomes.
For more information on your insurance options, please contact Jenn Negley, Vice President, Risk Strategies Company at 267-251-2233 or JNegley@Risk-Strategies.com.
It’s no secret that there is a nationwide shortage of skilled medical professionals, particularly nurses and physician assistants, which has resulted in longer work weeks for many employees. Those staffing shortages will not be resolved soon and healthcare employers need to be careful to avoid running afoul of federal and state wage and hours laws governing the payment of overtime compensation.
FIRST, I WANTED to share how much I enjoy feedback on these editorials. When people take time to agree or disagree, it improves both of our thinking. My perspective comes from my
We have certainly been living through interesting times these past few years. Leadership has faced numerous challenges—some “once in a hundred years” events. Still, I am happy to report that the vast majority of our clients have thrived as they turned up their creativity and ingenuity, leaned their businesses, and opened their minds to new ways of operating. But as we all know; our work is never done. Change is the only constant, and leaders are looking cautiously toward 2023.
As its name implies, continuous improvement is a never-ending process. Whether it is the need for greater sales, increased productivity, or anything in between, there is always something that can be improved upon. Continuous improvement can occur as a major event or transformation such as a Kaizen event, or it can occur through daily, gradual improvements with a Kata approach. When organizations realize successes with these continual improvement efforts, many will claim to have achieved some degree of operational excellence. But what is operational excellence, and what does a manufacturing organization look like once it achieves a level of operational excellence?
The topic for this article came through a request that focused on Medicaid. However, I decided to expand the topic to include Long Term Care Planning because this is an extremely robust topic, as you will see. The question that serves as the title of this piece illustrates how much confusion lies in this area of Wealth Management.
Politicians. Lobbyists. Elected officials. Legislation. Laws. Regulations. Do those words generate a positive or negative connotation? While answers will vary depending on individual circumstances or experiences, one thing is for sure: They all impact how the construction industry functions and influence decisions of construction industry employers. The Syracuse Builders Exchange chooses to advocate and educate in an effort to support a position which is most advantageous to the industry.
Left to right: Amy Tucker, MD, MHCM, Marylin Galimi, Chief Operations Officer, Marisa Desimone, MD, Nancy Daoust, EdD, FACHE, LNHA
Upstate Nappi Longevity Institute Groundbreaking
