State of Construction Industry

Earl R Hall, Executive Director – Syracuse Builders Exchange

By most measures, 2023 was a strong year for construction industry employers throughout upstate New York.  Measuring growth can be subjective, however, the increase in membership at the Syracuse Builders Exchange is one standard metric which is objective.  Membership increased to 970 at the end of 2023, with 42 new member employers joining during the year.  Today, the Syracuse Builders Exchange remains the largest construction industry Association in the state of New York.

Another metric used to measure growth is the total number of building projects for bid compared to 2022.  Building projects for bid increased 3.6% from 5,064 in 2022 to 5,244 in 2023.  The increase was driven by continued public investment in the medical, secondary and higher education markets, coupled with strong private capital investments in the industrial, multi-family residential, and commercial markets. 

Central New York is poised to continue sustained construction growth into 2024 with many regional project owners beginning work on such projects as:

  • Onondaga County STEAM School
  • MICRON
  • Turning Stone Expansion
  • Onondaga County Aquarium
  • Syracuse Inner Harbor Development

The continued optimism associated with regional economic development, coupled with increased construction bidding opportunities, is somewhat tampered by a potential recession, lack of adequate skilled labor, increased material costs and aggressive project schedules.  The construction industry is not immune from periodic challenges, but contractors have proven to be resilient over the past century as they continue to deliver finished projects to owners.

Labor will continue to be the most concerning matter going into 2024 as the lack of skilled craftsmen and craftswomen may impact contractors’ abilities to bid additional work and/or to complete tight schedules on time.  Although the building trades’ unions and non-signatory employers have been aggressively attempting to recruit, train, and retain construction workers, such efforts have not produced a labor pool large enough to accommodate the current projects scheduled to being in 2024.  There remains much optimism the abundance of work will attract skilled craftspeople from other geographies throughout the United States.

Labor wages continue to increase at rates upstate New York has rarely seen.  Wage increases vary by trade but have averaged close to 4% per year in the past two years, and in some cases higher.  Such wage increases have been driven by high inflation, huge demand for skilled labor and significant increased costs associated with food, gas, and clothing.   Labor costs and the availability of skilled labor will continue to be of concern throughout the year.

The anticipated economic development to hit central New York will be led by the construction industry.  Although many leaders in the secondary and higher education arenas are focused on careers inside these yet to be built new buildings and facilities, those project owners need to first build those facilities.  Most suburban school districts are a decade behind in developing career and technical education programs, in particular construction career pathways.  And while regional BOCES programs remain vital to the construction industry, those student seats are limited.  The need for a four-year construction curriculum is essential in developing the next generation skilled workforce contractors and project owners desperately needed.  The only way to meet the incredible economic development opportunities that await central New York is to have the skilled work force to build those projects.

 

These issues are not unique to upstate New York as such is prevailing throughout the country.  Although such headwinds are anticipated to continue in the short term, contractors and project owners alike remain resilient and will explore developing alternative methods to deliver a finished project. 

Navigating an Uncertain Economy: Forecasting Manufacturing Needs

By: Jim D’Agostino

Manufacturers are no strangers to economic uncertainties. Whether facing global financial crises, recessions, trade disruptions, or unexpected events like pandemics, the ability to accurately forecast manufacturing needs becomes even more critical during turbulent economic times. In this quarter’s column, we’ll explore the best strategies to forecast manufacturing needs effectively in an uncertain economy.

Data-Driven Decision-Making: In uncertain economic times, relying on data-driven decision-making is paramount. Manufacturers should invest in advanced analytics and data collection tools to gather real-time data on production, inventory levels, customer orders, and market trends. By leveraging this data, businesses can make informed decisions about production schedules, inventory management, and resource allocation, thereby minimizing risks associated with economic fluctuations.

Scenario Planning, Contingency Planning, and Risk Mitigation: Scenario and contingency planning involves creating multiple hypothetical scenarios based on different economic outcomes. Manufacturers should develop a range of scenarios, from optimistic to pessimistic, to understand the potential impacts of economic changes on their operations, and then they should identify potential risks, assess their impact on production, and develop strategies to mitigate these risks. This proactive approach allows companies to adjust their production strategies swiftly and efficiently in response to different economic scenarios, ensuring resilience in the face of uncertainty. These plans may include workforce adjustments, temporary production slowdowns, or alternative sourcing strategies.

Supply Chain Diversification: Manufacturers often rely on global supply chains, which can be vulnerable during uncertain economic times due to disruptions in transportation, logistics, or raw material availability. Diversifying supply chains by sourcing materials from multiple suppliers or considering localized sourcing options can help mitigate risks associated with supply chain disruptions. This strategy ensures a more reliable flow of materials, reducing the impact of economic uncertainties on manufacturing operations.

Collaboration and Communication: Effective communication and collaboration between various departments within a manufacturing company are crucial during uncertain economic times. Cross-functional teams should regularly share insights and updates regarding market conditions, customer demands, and supply chain disruptions. This collaborative approach helps identify potential bottlenecks and allows for quick adjustments to production plans and inventory levels.

Demand Forecasting and Predictive Analytics: To forecast manufacturing needs accurately in an uncertain economy, manufacturers should invest in demand forecasting tools and predictive analytics. These technologies use historical data, market trends, and customer behavior analysis to predict future demand more accurately. Implementing predictive analytics can help businesses adjust production schedules, optimize inventory levels, and align their resources with expected market fluctuations. Manufacturers should not view their forecasting strategies as static; instead, they should continuously monitor economic indicators, market trends, and customer behavior. By staying vigilant and adaptable, companies can respond swiftly to changing economic conditions and adjust their production plans accordingly. This ongoing monitoring allows for more accurate forecasting in the face of uncertainty.

Lean Manufacturing and Inventory Management: Lean manufacturing principles focus on minimizing waste and optimizing resource utilization. During uncertain economic periods, it’s essential to adopt lean practices to enhance flexibility and reduce costs. Efficient inventory management is a critical component of lean manufacturing, as it ensures that materials are readily available while minimizing excess inventory that can become a financial burden during economic downturns.

Customer-Centric Approach: A customer-centric approach is vital for manufacturers looking to successfully navigate uncertain economic waters. Close communication with customers and a deep understanding of their evolving needs can help manufacturers tailor their production efforts to meet changing demands. This customer-focused strategy not only enhances customer satisfaction but also improves forecasting accuracy.

In uncertain economic environments, forecasting manufacturing needs is a challenging yet essential task. By adopting data-driven decision-making, scenario planning, collaboration, demand forecasting, supply chain diversification, lean manufacturing principles, continuous monitoring, contingency planning, and a customer-centric approach, manufacturers can position themselves to thrive amidst economic uncertainty. These strategies allow manufacturers to adapt, mitigate risks, and make informed decisions, ultimately ensuring their resilience and success in turbulent economic times.

If you are a small or mid-size manufacturer and would like to further the discussion, TDO’s team is fully certified to help. Reach out today to learn more and schedule a free consultation!

Happy New Year—In Your Companies!

Pierre Morrisseau

While 2024 will present many of the usual business challenges and, I’m sure, some novel ones, I believe there is much to be excited about and new opportunities for growth and success.

In my last installment I shared interesting viewpoints on how incorporating happiness in our careers and workplaces has a major positive impact on employee attraction, retention, and performance. I also shared what I learned about how the brain can be rewired through repetitive reinforcement to achieve a positive mindset.

As we head into a new year, I want to share what we’ve learned from implementing changes in our own workplace to increase happiness, and ultimately, results.

We started the process with a focus on helping leadership understand and embrace the psychology and goals of promoting the power of happiness in our workplace. They needed to know that the science supported what we were about to embark upon. After all, it would be a major challenge to have our leadership adopt the behavior of being always positive and continually sharing that positivity and enthusiasm with their teams if they themselves had negative views of what we were trying to achieve. Of course, it all had to start with senior-most leaders.

I can share that it was a clear challenge amidst all the negativity, division and bad news that seems to be pervasive in our society. However, by forcing myself to stop and find the good in each situation and finding what author and happiness expert Shawn Achor calls the Third Path. By always looking for the Third Path, our leadership team was able to avoid either/or, this or that, or worse, or else situations that paralyze employees and submarine true collaboration.

I am pleased to see as our leaders evolve, there is far more positivity in our workplace, more collaboration, and increased empathy for each other which has led to far greater desire to help one another—all of which has had a clear impact on the happiness factor in our workplace.

Since implementing (changing our attitudes may be a better way of saying it) our initiative, we have seen a marked improvement in turnover, better candidates being attracted to our company, and, while a bit early to attribute increased sales results to increased happiness, we are experiencing healthy growth above our norm. Certainly, in our minds, happier employees tend to make our clients happier. Data analysis throughout 2024 will provide a clearer picture and I look forward to sharing our findings.

Here is what our roadmap for changing attitudes and creating an environment of trust and happiness looks like:

  • Pause: find the good in every situation and individual;
  • Use clear, direct, open, honest communication and active listening;
  • Invite participation (proactive inquiry) encourage feedback;
  • Value input and adopt suggestions;
  • Encourage risk-taking and making mistakes as positive learning experiences (what Achor calls Falling Forward);
  • Engage only in productive disagreement;
  • Nurture a learning, growth, mentoring/coaching environment.

While this might seem a forbidding list of actions, it turns out the psychological science is correct: when you begin with one behavior—seeing the positives everywhere around us—we naturally progress to the next step in the process.

I have a strong belief in creating happiness in the workplace and I’m driven to achieve a happiness culture. The opportunities and rewards are simply too great. The potential of people working together in harmony is very powerful. Together we are able to achieve amazing things. We are well on our way. And for that I am happy!

As always, I am most interested in learning about what others are doing to reduce risk and solve business challenges. I would love to hear your thoughts.

 

Corporate Transparency Act

by Benjamin Goldberg

On January 1, 2024, a new federal law, the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), will go into effect. The main purpose of the CTA is to crack down on the proliferation of shell companies used as shields in money laundering, tax avoidance, and similar activities. However, the new reporting requirements will also compel most businesses created by filing documents with the Secretary of State to provide the information outlined in the CTA. Any business entity that must report to FinCEN is called a “reporting company” in the language of the CTA.  The information will have to be reported to the Financial Crime Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), which is part of the Department of Treasury.

There are three main parts to the new reporting requirements: beneficial ownership information (“BOI”), company applicants, and information about the reporting company itself.

Reporting companies must submit the information of everyone possessing beneficial ownership. A beneficial owner is defined in the CTA as an “individual who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, exercises substantial control over the entity, or owns or controls 25 percent or more of the ownership interests of the entity or receives substantial economic benefits from the assets of the entity.[1]” While owning or controlling over 25 percent of the business entity is fairly straightforward, the definition of “substantial control” is less obvious. Within the CTA, the definition of substantial control is expansive. It includes, but is not limited to, any senior officers of the company, persons having authority over the appointment or removal of any senior officer or a majority of board members, persons who direct or have substantial influence over important decisions made by the entity or have control over an intermediary entity that exercises substantial control over a reporting company. Since the definition of a beneficial owner is expansive, careful consideration will have to be given to make sure everyone who meets the definition of a beneficial owner has their BOI entered into the FinCEN site.

A “company applicant” is the individual who files the application with the Secretary of State and, in addition, the person who directs or controls the filing if more than one individual is involved. However, at least at this point in time, there can only be two company applicants. The company applicants might not be anyone who works for or controls the reporting company in question. The company applicant could, for instance, be the lawyer and paralegal hired to help bring the entity into existence. The company applicant information will only have to be submitted once.

The reporting company will need to disclose its 1) legal name, 2) DBA names, 3) business address, 4) state of formation, and 5) Taxpayer Identification Number.

The beneficial owners of the reporting company will have to disclose their 1) legal name, 2) date of birth, 3) residential address, 4) unique number from an acceptable document such as a U.S. passport, state ID, or driver’s license, and 5) an image of that document.

The company applicants will need to disclose the same information as the beneficial owners with one potential difference: if the company applicant is registering the company in the course of the applicant’s business, such as lawyers, paralegals, or others, then the business address of the law firm will be substituted for the residential address. Also, the company applicant information will be required only for business entities that are formed on or after Jan. 1, 2024. The BOI will be required of all entities that are reporting companies regardless of their date of formation.

Businesses already in existence on Jan. 1, 2024, will have one year to file an initial report. For Businesses formed on or after Jan. 1, 2024, and before Jan. 1, 2025, an initial report must be provided to FinCEN within ninety days of formation. On and after Jan. 1, 2025, businesses will have to submit the required information within thirty days of formation. Another thing to note is that changes in beneficial ownership will need to be filed. Any changes in ownership or changes in organizational structure will require subsequent filings to keep the BOI up-to-date.

Certain businesses are exempt from the reporting requirement, but most of these businesses are those in heavily regulated areas of finance. Otherwise, the important exemption to note is the “large operating company.” To qualify as such, a company needs 1) more than 20 full-time employees, 2) more than 5 million dollars in gross receipts/sales in the US, and 3) a commercial, physical street address in the US. All three of these elements must be met. For example, a business that operates online with no commercial, physical street address will not qualify for the exemption even if it has more than 20 employees and over 5 million dollars in gross receipts or sales. The other exemptions will be listed at the end of this post.

While this legislation has mostly flown under the radar and might come as a surprise to many business owners, there is still time to prepare the necessary information. CCBLaw is here to help answer any questions and assist your business to ensure compliance with the CTA.

In the meantime, to avoid potential civil and criminal penalties, entities that will qualify as reporting companies should make determinations as to who will be considered a beneficial owner under the CTA and gather the necessary information to submit to the FinCEN portal once it is active. Importantly, reporting companies will also want to consider who will have the responsibility of updating any changes in BOI to FinCEN because, as addressed above, as beneficial ownership changes, BOI is required to be updated within 30 days of any such change.

More links:

FinCEN website

Small Entity Compliance Guide

FinCEN contact page

Benjamin Goldberg is an associate at CCB Law.  He can be reached at 315-477-6214 or bgoldberg@ccblaw.com.

[1]31 C.F.R. § 1010.380(d)

Artificial Intelligence   

By: Kathryn Ruscitto

We are planning a Heritage trip and have spent hours doing research.  My daughter pulled up Chat GPT, gave it a few directions and in 30 seconds it listed an itinerary, things to visit, and lots of other info for consideration. 

In a moment it became clear to me how Artificial Intelligence can augment my work. I still had to decide who, what, where, and when, but AI took the data that exists, boiled it down and gave me options to start with. It saved time, and while not perfect, gave me info I had not looked at prior.

Can AI do the same thing in health care? From chronic illness , to assisting in the development of new devices and drugs, can AI supplement clinicians work flow? Can it review charts and data, predict at risk patients, and match patients to treatments?

The current use of AI in some phone processes, has proven to be a barrier when a question did not fit the algorithms.

In time, those early designs will be improved. For AI to work in health care, it needs to be integrated into clinician workflows, not added as yet another step.

The debate about AI replacing human decisions is concerning and deserves consideration. But more likely it will free the workforce from analytical tasks and move to higher level thinking.  In addition, other concerns relate to the bias of the data.  But the advancement of AI will likely be similar to the integration of computers, smart phones and laptops into our daily lives.  They didn’t replace humans, but a human without a smart phone or laptop does not have the advantages in easily accessing info and education. If AI can improve care for patients, by adding to the analytical knowledge of clinicians in an era of accelerated information and inventions, it will advance care.

I looked for some examples where AI is integrated in health care and found  specialists are using AI in nephrology and cancer treatments. “Penny” at UPenn is helping clinicians with complex patients between visits, “The technology has the potential to improve patient health by guiding them through complex medication schedules, keeping clinicians routinely updated about a patient’s condition, and enabling clinicians to step in at early signs of trouble.”

https://www.aamc.org/news/how-ai-helping-doctors-communicate-patients

Additionally there are  many  applications already in use for detecting disease through programs that analyze bacteria, and other disease criteria to lead to diagnosis and treatment in radiology, pathology and cancer treatments.

For clinicians to be comfortable with machine learning, or language learning that reads patient records and integrates info to recommend treatment, they will want a clear understanding of the quality of the ap’s learning. Also, it’s track record in making accurate diagnosis, and their ability to integrate their own clinical  history and knowledge. The AMA cautions clinicians about bias and inaccuracy in todays AI algorithms, but notes it will continue to improve and tomorrows physicians will see a reduction in paperwork burden and back room operations from chart reviews to billing. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/why-generative-ai-chatgpt-cannot-replace-physicians

In the past 100 years we have moved from an agrarian society, to an industrial society, to an age of information. We have now entered what is being called the age of knowledge, or the creative age.  Understanding AI’s  potential is our best advantage to adapting it in applications for health care.

Resources 

https://www.jnj.com/innovation/artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare?&utm_source=goog

AI Won’t Replace Humans

https://hbr.org/2023/08/ai-wont-replace-humans-but-humans-with-ai-will-replace-humans-without-ai

The Current State of AI in Healthcare:

https://healthtechmagazine.net/article/2022/12/ai-healthcare-2023-ml-nlp-more-perfcon

 

Kathryn Ruscitto, Advisor can be reached at linkedin.com/ln/kathrynruscitto or at krusct@gmail.com

 

Abscope Environmental, Inc. Celebrates 35-Year Anniversary

by Becca Taurisano

Abscope Environmental, Inc. is a Canastota, New York-based, full-service remediation firm in its 35th year of business, thanks to a proud legacy started by founders John Romagnoli and his son, Jack. Beginning in 1989 as solely an asbestos abatement company, Abscope expanded into more comprehensive environmental remediation services in 1994 and fast tracked its growth in 2004 when Jack’s brother Jerry came on board. Planning for their succession, Jack and Jerry looked to their youngest brother, Bob Romagnoli, to take the reins. Bob became President of Abscope in 2019 and later, CEO, in 2020 as both brothers retired. While the company has experienced tremendous growth since its founding, Bob and his partners are now poised to expand into new geographical regions, offer new and innovative services, and most importantly, sustain the business for the next generation.

An Experienced Leadership Team

With more than 25 years of environmental consulting experience, Bob Romagnoli is an engineer by trade, but brought a vast array of leadership and operational skills to help Abscope redefine itself as a more state-of-the-art organization. During his career, Romagnoli led multi-million-dollar Superfund sediment remediation programs and developed turn-key environmental strategies for Fortune 100 companies, serving as Sr. Vice President at Arcadis and Managing Director at TIG Environmental.

Working closely with Romagnoli are three key long-time Abscope employees: Executive Vice President Rob Gray, Executive Vice President Robert Duffy, and General Manager, Steve Mitchell. All three have been with the company for decades and are part owners of the firm.

Rob Gray joined Abscope in 1995 when he started as an estimator. Over time his role grew into a managerial one and he currently serves as the Executive Vice President of the Environmental Remediation and Geotechnical Services division. Gray has extensive experience in Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) remediation, hazardous waste remediation, stream sediment removal, In-Situ Stabilization (ISS), sheet pile installation, deep excavations, and site development projects.

Executive Vice President Robert Duffy and General Manager Steve Mitchell lead the Asbestos Abatement and Industrial Decontamination division. They oversee the removal, encapsulation, enclosure, transportation, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials, building demolition, and lead and mold remediation. Duffy has been part of the Abscope team since its inception in 1989 and has been crucial to its success and growth. He is responsible for estimating, proposal development, submittal generation, waste disposal coordination, and final report development, not to mention business development.

Mitchell has been with the company 30 years and is responsible for coordinating manpower across both divisions, a task that can be very challenging, especially in today’s environment. “Stevie’s attention to detail is second to none” says Romagnoli. “He’s the ultimate team player and always puts the company’s interests first.” 

Romagnoli said it took some time for the leadership team to learn how to best work together but have now struck the right balance. “These three guys have been here for decades and have significantly contributed to the success of this company,” said Romagnoli. “My role is to allow them to continue building on that success, while bringing a new perspective on operational and strategic matters.”

A Fresh Perspective

After joining Abscope, Romagnoli immediately identified several key areas for improvement, the most evident of which was in-house technology. While IT changes are never easy to implement, Romagnoli felt they were imperative to keeping Abscope at the forefront of the industry.

As an example, Abscope invested heavily in upgrading their take-off and estimating systems. The conversion to InSite and HeavyBid allowed for higher productivity and more accurate results. According to Romagnoli, the value was apparent from day one. “Our PMs have done a great job in assimilating to these new systems which in turn have allowed them to be much more productive. Given the complexity of the new platforms, we’ve only scratched the surface of their potential. I’m excited to see how much more we can extract and use to our benefit.”

Abscope also upgraded the GPS equipment on their “yellow iron” with the latest, most cutting-edge Trimble™ technology, including Trimble™ TSC7 v2s and R780 bases and rovers. The new equipment delivers the latest in field technology, optimizing efficiency and most importantly, accuracy. Abscope’s fleet is extensive, consisting of approximately 30 pieces of heavy equipment.

On the administration side, Abscope recently converted the invoice approval and payment process from paper-based to digital. “It is much more efficient for our PMs to digitally approve vendor invoices versus dealing with mounds and mounds of paper,” said Romagnoli. “The system has also minimized duplicate or erroneous payments.” Field Superintendents are also joining in Abscope’s IT revolution, now using tablet apps to track time, significantly reducing transcription errors within the accounting department.

New Horizons

From the types of projects, the size and scope of the work, and even the geographical location, much has changed at Abscope since its beginning in 1989. Most recently, there has been a surge of projects in the alternative energy space and Abscope has provided civil works for commercial-scale solar and wind projects. The work generally includes preparing the site for ultimate component installation by others and consists of earthwork, installation of storm water drainage, development of access roads, crane pads, and various other site features.

“Alternative energy has exploded for us, and it is not something that we necessarily expected,” said Romagnoli. “Smaller, more local opportunities have opened us up to much larger and broader opportunities nation-wide.” In fact, there has been so much growth, Abscope is considering the creation of a new division to execute the work.

Abscope’s job size and scope 

has changed too over the years. In the early years, jobs were $500,000 or less lasting up to a month, but now jobs range from $10 to $12 million lasting six months to a year. “The diversity of our projects shows how we have grown,” said Gray. “Today our projects are more complicated and the systems we have been installing are much more sophisticated.”

Geographically things are changing as well. Gray recalls in the early days, most of the work was within a two-to-three-hour radius, but not lately. Remediation projects are bringing Abscope’s crews to the Mid Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and as far away as Puerto Rico. In 2022, they successfully completed a challenging six-month project in Dallas, TX with a world-renowned chemical manufacturer, where Abscope remediated asbestos contaminated soil on residential and small commercial properties. “We are now set up well to handle these larger, more complex projects,” said Romagnoli. “It is exciting to see such large and iconic companies/clients view us as a trusted partner.”

Thanks to the successful completion of the Dallas project, the very same Fortune 500 client selected Abscope for a large PCB soil remediation project in Puerto Rico in 2024. “We are grateful to them for giving us this unique opportunity to assist in such a highly visible and intricate project, especially in a geographic location that’s not necessarily familiar to us.” Abscope has invested a significant amount of time and money to make sure the project goes off without a hitch. “Ideally we’d love to leverage this opportunity to do other work (e.g., emergency response and disaster assistance) in Puerto Rico in future years, but for now, we need to keep our eye on the ball and ensure that this critical project is successful” said Romagnoli.

With Romagnoli’s experience 

in sediment removal, stream remediation, and shoreline stabilization, Abscope has been doing more work in those markets as well. “We most recently did a shoreline stabilization job in Lackawanna along Lake Erie,” said Gray. “With all the erosion from wind and waves, shoreline stabilization has been a big area of focus for us.” The addition of wetland and stream remediation is one example of how complex their current projects are due to the adherence to regulations with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on the plantings, soils, and rocks required during the restoration process.

As work around the country continues to grow, Romagnoli and Gray are considering an expansion into new office locations. “We are looking to expand in the near future and discussing our growth plans for the Mid Atlantic area,” Gray said. With upcoming work in Puerto Rico, Romagnoli could see an office location in Florida as well to support the Southeast and Caribbean. “There is a lot of potential there, just a question of if and where,” he said.

Safety First

From environmental remediation to asbestos abatement, sediment dredging to shore stabilization, deep excavation to restoration, safety is Abscope’s number one priority. Duffy was instrumental in the creation of project-specific health and safety work plans for Abscope’s company-wide, behavior-based Health and Safety program. His daily interaction with clients, regulatory personnel, subcontractors, and project engineers as well as having managed or supervised over 3,500 asbestos abatement projects gives him a keen understanding of the safety issues facing field workers. “There are so many things that could go wrong on a job,” said Duffy. “We have to get ahead of it and make sure everyone is as safe as possible.”

On project sites, Abscope superintendents hold Toolbox Talks or safety meetings every morning to discuss the particulars of the job, what protective equipment is required, and what to do if something goes wrong. “Our guys in the field are very diligent when it comes to safety; they know there are no short cuts,” said Romagnoli.

The leadership team, Project Managers, and employees in the field also attend monthly safety calls to share stories about “good catches;” things on the job that could cause an injury. Good catches are recognized on the monthly safety calls and quarterly safety awards are given out to employees who are most focused on safety. “We rank health and safety here above everything else,” said Gray. “We take it very seriously.”

Investing in the Future

One of Romagnoli’s other priorities has been to bolster Abscope’s employee benefits and incentives. Romagnoli is focused not only on employee retention but attracting new talent as well. As an example, Romagnoli established a 401(k) program for the company back in 2020 to help employees help themselves. Abscope also provides a generous match. In addition, Romagnoli also set up a tuition reimbursement program that is meant to

encourage staff to continuously improve their skills. “We’re always looking to get better, but we want to make sure to take care of those that continue to make this company what it is,” he said.

Looking ahead to the future, Romagnoli would like to see the company grow to $25-30 million over the next five years. From acquisitions to new office locations, he is focused on building out systems and services to benefit the next generation. “My Dad would be bursting with pride seeing that the company has stayed in the family and become so much more than what he anticipated it to be,” he said. There is the potential for other family members to join the company at some point, but for now, Abscope is flourishing under current ownership. By honoring the past and continuing the proud legacy of the Romagnoli family into the future, Abscope is poised to be sustainable for generations to come.  

NYS MAKES SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENTS TO THE PROMPT PAYMENT ACT

Diana Plue, Esq. Sheats & Bailey, PLLC

On November 17, 2023, New York State amended sections of General Business Law Article 35E, known as the Prompt Payment Act, which applies to all private commercial construction projects having a value of $150,000.00 or more. This new legislation amends two sections of the Prompt Payment Act: General Business Law section 756-a and 756-c.

Section §756-a (2) of the Prompt Payment Act is amended to allow a contractor to submit a final invoice that includes retainage upon substantial completion of the contract, as defined or contemplated by the terms of the contract.  This is a notable departure from the prior version of the statute, where a Contractor had to wait to submit a final invoice until the contractor performed all its obligations under the contract.

The amendment to GBL § 756-c, limits the amount of retainage that can be withheld by an owner, contractor, or subcontractor on a private construction project. Under this new legislation, the maximum amount of retainage that can be withheld on private construction projects is five percent (5%).  In addition, contractors and subcontractors cannot withhold more retainage than the owner.  So, if the owner does not withhold the maximum 5% in retainage, then the contractor or subcontractor cannot withhold the maximum 5% retainage. Upon receipt of retainage, a contractor or subcontractor must release a proportionate amount of retainage to the relevant down the line subcontractor. Failure to release the retainage per GBL §756-c subjects the owner, contractor, or subcontractor to pay interest at the rate of 1% per month from the date retention was due and owing until paid.  

On their face these amendments dictate that the maximum amount of retainage withheld can only be 5% and that retainage can be billed before the project is fully complete. However, the opening of section 756-a states “except as otherwise provided in this article, the terms and conditions of a construction contract shall supersede the provisions of this article and govern the conduct of the parties thereto.”  Section 757 of the Prompt Payment Act provides only four instances where terms of a contract are void and therefore the parties conduct is fully governed by the Prompt Payment Act, and not the contract terms.  The amount of retainage withheld and the contracts definition of substantial completion are not one of the listed contract terms that are void.  As such, we think there are ways with carefully constructed contract provisions to still withhold 10%. 

Furthermore, the amendment to the GBL §756-a leave the definition of substantial completion to the contracting parties.  Thus, the definition needs to be carefully drafted and vetted by the parties as the definition will dictate when a final invoice can be submitted and thus when final payment received. 

For more information, contact Sheats & Bailey, PLLC; a law firm dedicated to serving the construction industry.  Tel: (315) 676-7314

The information provided in this article is not intended to serve as specific legal advice for any particular situation. Competent legal and experienced counsel should be consulted.

NYS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION – COVID-19 UPDATE

ANNETTE MALPICA, VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR OF CLAIMS & LEGAL COUNSEL, LOVELL SAFETY MANAGEMENT CO, LLC

Is fear of contracting the COVID-19 virus a compensable mental injury under the Workers’ Compensation statute? On July 20, 2023, The Appellate Division-Third Department in three separate unanimous opinions decided the issue with a resounding “NO”.

Matters of Matthews, Brown, and Djanuzakov* involved claims filed against the New York City Transit Authority and its subsidiary by claimants who had public facing jobs.  The claimants, a train conductor, cleaner and bus driver filed mental stress claims alleging various psychological conditions as a result of being exposed to COVID-19 in the workplace. The claimants never contracted COVID prior to filing the claim however, they claimed exposure to other workers who tested positive and several coworkers and passengers who died of COVID-19 causing claimants to feel unsafe, depressed, and afraid to return to work.  In all three claims, the treating psychologists gave total disability, finding that the psychological symptoms made it impossible for the claimants to return to work. All three claims were disallowed by the Law Judge and the Workers’ Compensation Board.

In Matter of Brown, the claim was disallowed due to insufficient medical evidence to establish a causal nexus between the mental stress and claimant’s job duties. In Matters of Matthews and Djanuzakov, the Board disallowed the claims finding that the stress experienced by the claimant (train conductor and bus driver respectively) was the same as other similarly situated workers during the pandemic. The attorney representing all three claimants appealed to the Third Department.

The Court noted that “it is well settled that a mental injury arising from work-related stress is compensable” and the fact that the condition was pre-existing will not preclude the claim if the claimant’s employment exacerbated the condition as “to cause a disability which did not previously exist.” The claimant, however, must demonstrate that the stress that caused the injury was “greater than that which other similarly situated workers experienced in the normal work environment.” The Workers’ Compensation Board, as the fact finder, determines whether workplace stress is extraordinary based upon the evidence presented to it. In all three claims, the Third Department found that the Board’s reasoning was supported by the case law and affirmed its decisions.      

2017 and 2022 Legislation to Address Mental Stress Injuries

WCL Section 10 recognizes that certain stressful situations at work may trigger disabling mental injuries. In order for a mental injury to be compensable, the stress that caused it must be considered to be greater than the normal stress at work experienced by similarly situated workers. This evidentiary standard sets a high bar. In 2017, the legislature in recognition of the high standard for mental injury claims by police officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians created a carve out by removing the restriction that a mental stress claim had to be greater than the stress sustained by similar first responders.

During the 2022 legislative session, the Assembly and Senate passed a bill that would have extended the exception carve out for first responders to the entire labor force (A2020-A/S.6373-B). In addition, the bill if passed, would eliminate the requirement that the stress stemmed from a work emergency. The Governor vetoed the bill, noting the significant cost to the system, this however, did not stop the bill from being reintroduced during the 2023 session. In 2023, A.5745/S.6635 passed the Senate, but failed to pass the Assembly.       

For more information on workers’ compensation contact Lovell at 1-800-5-LOVELL or visit online www. Lovellsafety.com.

*Matter of Sheldon Matthews v. New York City Transit Authority, 218 AD3d 983 (2023)

Matter of Tracey Brown v. New York City Transit Authority, 218 AD3d 967 (2023)

Matter of Djanuzakov v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 218 AD3d 980 (2023)

Insurance Renewals – Navigating the Hard Market

Actions that aid results

By: Brett Findlay, Vice President, Business Risk Specialist, OneGroup

The New York construction industry, and realistically the entire New York business landscape, is in the midst of an insurance hard market. The lack of insurance availability and the pricing volatility associated with it is leaving consumers in a difficult place when it comes to their insurance renewals. Although insurance options may be limited, it’s critical to know what or who those options are and when to approach them. Proactively managing your program can be an effective solution to unpredictable insurance renewals.

A hard insurance market is characterized by an increased demand for insurance coverage coupled with reduced supply. Underwriting guidelines from the carriers will become more stringent, policies issued by carriers will decrease, premiums are higher, and carriers are less willing to negotiate terms. The current market is hard and exhibits all of those tendencies. The question is, how do you proactively and effectively manage your program to counter the marketplace?

There are a couple simple strategies you can deploy to make this process more manageable and limit surprises and negative outcomes for your business.

Know where to look. A lack of options and higher prices are attributable to most coverage lines of insurance right now, including but not limited to property, commercial automobile liability, and umbrella liability. Identifying the key coverage lines of your program and asking your agent what the renewal is looking like early in the process is the first step. At that point, you should be gathering the data necessary for the carriers to quote those lines for you. Accurate data, provided in full 90+ days prior to the renewal date, will help your cause.

Be ahead of the renewal. By starting the renewal process early, 90+ days out, and by utilizing a broker who understands your business and the insurance marketplace, you’re putting yourself in a better position. It’s critical to select a broker that has availability to those necessary carriers. Ask the broker at that early stage what their marketing strategy is, what carriers they’ll be approaching and why.  Some of the carriers may need to visit your operations and meet with key team members in advance of providing alternatives. As they are interviewing you, this is a great time to ask them questions to see if a partnership would be a good fit for your operations and growth strategy. This is a key reason for why timing is so important. When you are discussing this process with your agent, if you’re not comfortable with their answers, it may be time to find a new one.

Know the landscape (and how to work within it). Much like the construction industry, insurance companies aren’t immune to staffing shortages either. Underwriters are going to work on accounts where they have all the data necessary to finish their process and in a timely manner. If you are not in front of them early, with what they need, the likelihood that you’ll be getting their best is drastically reduced.

It’s equally important that your agent is competent in representing your best attributes. The ability of that agent to forecast the costs and insurance availability with the proper insurance carrier should be a pre-requisite. Knowing how to communicate your businesses story is also key. You need someone who knows construction, knows your business, and knows the carriers and underwriters that are writing insurance competitively for your type of operations.

Relationships Matter. A broker’s relationship with their carriers is every bit as important as your relationship to your agent; there are two sides to the relationship. Having an agency that is well respected in the local insurance marketplace is critical to getting the best program in place at the most competitive cost. This becomes even more critical when the availability of options is limited. I firmly believe that instead of selecting multiple brokers to “quote” your insurance, it’s significantly more beneficial to interview brokers and select one to represent you. You’ll garner greater respect and attention to your business if the local underwriters know that you’re serious about your program and who represents it. If they get multiple submissions from different agents, and the data those agents submit is conflicting, the likelihood that you’ll get their best is also limited.

Typically, a hard market is not a fun process to go through. But you have the ability to proactively position your business to handle the situation. Talk to your agent, prepare yourself for the unexpected and the possibility of having to market your insurance, and get in front of the curve. Contractors, especially in today’s Upstate New York economic landscape, must be sharper than ever to increase or even maintain profit margins. Preparing yourself for a hard market and forecasting any potential dramatic increases in your insurance costs will put you in a better position to control those margins.

For more information on renewing your insurance, you may reach out to Brett Findlay at 315-280-6376 or by email at BFindlay@OneGroup.com.

Knowing Your Financing Options for Purchasing Construction Equipment

Joseph A. Hardick, CPA, CCIFP, Dannible & McKee, LLP

When purchasing new construction equipment, one of the most important factors to consider is the financing option that works best for your needs. Paying in cash may be the most convenient and cost-effective option as it eliminates the concerns of long-term debt, high interest rates and debt-to-equity ratios. However, most construction companies opt for financing due to the lack of available funds.

There are three options available for financing equipment: short-term rental, lease, and loan. For our purposes, we will focus on the latter two. Although renting is a good choice for specialized equipment that’s only needed for a short period, it can be more expensive than taking out a loan or leasing. Renting is a suitable option here because there is no long-term commitment and maintenance is covered by the rental company.

Most companies, however, require long-term equipment availability. This is where leasing and financing are best suited. Both options have their pros and cons, so the best financing option will depend on how the equipment is being used.

Purchasing With a Loan

Obtaining a loan is the most common type of financing when acquiring equipment. It was particularly popular when there were low interest rates and fast tax depreciation options. With the rising rates, it is important to assess this option. Nevertheless, loans still offer many benefits, such as:

  • It is the most cost-effective option in the long run.
  • There are no usage restrictions.
  • Payments can be customized to suit your needs.
  • The equipment can be sold or traded at any time.
  • Tax benefits such as Section 179 deduction or bonus depreciation are available.

Purchasing equipment with a loan also has some downsides, including:

  • High initial cost and high down payments.
  • Higher monthly interest and payment.
  • Equipment can become outdated, potentially affecting resale value.
  • A significant impact on cash flow.

Leasing Equipment

Leasing is another form of financing that has become increasingly popular recently. However, it’s important to note that the rising interest rates have also affected new leases. Recently, there have been significant changes in the rules involving leases, which could greatly impact your decision when acquiring new equipment. There are two types of leases: finance leases and operating leases, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

A finance lease is similar to a loan, where it is a long-term commitment, and the equipment can be purchased at the end of the lease term. Several requirements must be met to qualify for a finance lease. The financial lease has the following characteristics:

  • Fixed payment plan based on the equipment’s useful life and fair market value.
  • Lower monthly interest and payment, but longer lease terms.
  • The equipment might have usage restrictions.
  • The option to buy at the end of the lease term, either at FMV or a predetermined price.
  • A long-term commitment, sometimes can be longer than a loan.

An operating lease is any other lease that doesn’t qualify as a financial lease. An operating lease is like a rental for an extended period, where the equipment must be returned without the option to purchase it at the end of the lease term. The operating lease has the following characteristics:

  • Flexible lease period.
  • Requires the equipment to be returned at the end of the lease term.
  • Does not impact the debt-to-equity ratio if it’s less than a year.
  • Offers access to newer models and technology.
  • Requires limited maintenance.
  • Last for a short term, usually three years, but can be modified.
  • Has higher monthly payments (flexibility comes at a cost!).

Summary

Making the right financial decision when purchasing equipment can greatly impact your profitability. The financial options available to you will depend on your specific situation, and there are many variables that need to be taken into consideration. However, if funds are readily available and the equipment is essential to your daily operations, paying in cash is the best option.

Contributing Author: Joseph A. Hardick, CPA, CCIFP, is a tax partner who has over 40 years of experience in all areas of individual and corporate income tax preparation and planning. Joe specializes in corporate tax and tax planning for manufacturing and construction companies.